If you went looking, here's what you'd find:
- A little over a year ago, I proposed a collaborative journalism project to look into Nevada City's then-recurrent* smelly drinking water. I was hoping to interest the local newspaper, community TV station, community radio station, online news site, and/or counterpart right-wing weblog in joining in, but the attempt to enlist these others did not meet with success. I did (and reported) a phone interview with the water plant operator, but never did feel confident that I understood the ultimate source of the problem. But while the project wasn't a success at educating the reader or writer, it likely helped, since the problem appears to be solved: for many months, the drinking water's been excellent.
(Many sincere thanks to those who fixed it!) - Several times in 2004 I posted the source material behind community controversies involving the local paper, so readers could judge for themselves (e.g. here); also found and reported the backstory to an article on the paper's publisher, that appeared Jan. 2005 in the Sacramento Bee.
- In June 2006 I became curious about the funding of the Sierra Environmental Studies Foundation; the principals were slow to respond when asked, so I looked into its background, and posted the findings.
(Received my first (and only overt) invitation to leave town shortly afterward, though I don't know that it was related.)
I still feel that there's more to this story.
And there are a number of half-finished cit-j projects, that need to be completed or jettisoned:
- Interview with local right-wing blogger, from last spring (thanks Russ and sorry to be such a slug)
- Interview with Lisa Randle of PG&E on November power outages, etc ( initial report here)
- Attempted repeatedly, without success, to get answers from our U.S. Representative, John Doolittle. Now that he wishes to reconnect with his constituents, I should try again.
- Looking behind the "CFC-free-shuttle-foam-disaster" rant radio story from over a year ago; I'd contacted the story's Stanford physicist source who said his views were misrepresented
- Historical project on the 1918 influenza pandemic and WWI as they were reported at that time in the local paper - started the series in Oct 2005, but left it on a cliffhanger...
Unfortunately, the finding out is typically much more interesting than the writing up.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Welcome, and thanks for caring enough to donate your time and thoughts toward greater collective wisdom...
Terms of engagement:
* Please be civil.
* * * * Please do not post anonymously * * * (I'd remove this choice if I could, and I may remove your comment if you do) - instead, do this:
Click on the 'Name/URL' radiobutton, then enter your real name (if you're brave) or a pseudonym (if you're not). (You can leave the "URL" field blank.)
Or go ahead and click "Anonymous", but put your name in your comment.
* The Management reserves the right to delete comments (Moderation Certificate can be found here). You can always post it on a blog of your own.
If you run into technical difficulties, please a) accept my apologies, then b) email your comment to aherror2011 at gmail.com with "Comment for [name of this blog]" in the Subject line.
New policy re climate contrarianism comments as of 11/11/2009:
Comments questioning the climate science community's understanding of climate change (97% of active climatologists now believe that the earth is currently warming and that it's human-caused - link) will be deleted unless the commenter:
a) is local
b) uses his real name
c) provides link(s) to substantiate his claim(s)/inference(s)
d) is willing to collaborate on constructing an argument tree, to get us past the usual sterile point-counterpoint-countercounterpoint.
(For people who can't read the above, a summary:
1) Be civil;
2) Don't post w/o giving at least a pseudonym;
3) Don't espouse climate-denial crankery unless you're local and willing to stand behind it.)
Caveats:
1. Comments could be delayed: they are being moderated, and I'm sometimes away from the computer for a day or more.
2. : Perfectly legitimate comments are sometimes miscategorized (by the blogging platform) as spam, & not published. If this happens to yours, please notify me, else I might not notice for a day or two.