Birman's response today:
"Tom was indeed a member of ALEC between roughly 2000 and 2003."
Stale blog offering Perspective on ideas, issues and life from Nevada County, California - belaboring the obvious since 2003
"Tom was indeed a member of ALEC between roughly 2000 and 2003."
"Reality is that which, when you refuse to believe in it, doesn't go away" - Philip K. Dick
NCFocus etc journalism sampler
3 comments:
So - the followup questions will be...
For Kimberly Pruett - when asked a question about the Congressman you work for, is it appropriate to just relay a denial from a fellow staffer, without independently checking that it's correct?
For Igor Birman and Cliff Wagner - when asked a Q about the politician you work for, is it appropriate to just provide an off-the-top-of-your-head recollection, rather than verifying that your recollection is correct?
(this assumes of course that the Q is of legitimate public interest - e.g., shedding light on who else the Congressman might be working for - and not something off the wall.)
p.s. Update to "ALEC staffers..." - I did get a response from ALEC (confirming that McClintock had been a member)
I did email Kim Pruett and Igor Birman asking if off-the-cuff recollections from aides were considered good enough responses for Qs (of legitimate public interest) asked of legislators, but didn't get a response from either.
In light of the faulty information from McClintock aides about his ALEC involvement, I sent a followup email to Cliff Wagner (who'd replied with a "personal recollection" about Dan Logue's ALEC membership), asking that he check with Mr. Logue to make sure his information was accurate - but didn't get a response from him either.
Post a Comment