That means you.
Science-aligned climate blogger Michael Tobis has a dialogue up, that lays out the big picture, and he's soliciting feedback/criticisms from you (*). Among its take-home messages is one of a largely-unrecognized uncertainty - we do not know how much global warming it takes to trigger a dangerous level of climate disruption.
"We know how to connect CO2 to warming, give or take a factor of two. We know that 5 C or 6 C on a global scale is huge. But we don't know where the danger point [for climate disruption] is. "And Tobis points out that we could be very close - perhaps there already. Recall Holdren's metaphor:
We're driving in a car with bad brakes [and with our children in the back seat] toward a cliff in the fog. We may not know exactly where the cliff is, or whether we'll be able to stop in time; but prudence demands that we try to stop the car.Read the dialogue, then see its lessons come to life this week's excellent NYTimes op-ed Disaster at the Top of the World. We don't have a lot of slack in the global food supply/production, and if reduced Arctic sea ice causes the jet stream to shift/weaken- as it seems to be doing...
The column also notes our tribalism and cognitive bias, and how they've been taken advantage of:
"Climate change has become an ideologically polarizing issue. It taps into deep personal identities and causes... “protective cognition” — we judge things in part on whether we see ourselves as rugged individualists mastering nature or as members of interconnected societies who live in harmony with the environment. Powerful special interests like the coal and oil industries have learned how to halt movement on climate policy by exploiting the fear people feel when their identities are threatened."Note to reflexive contrarians: this is not a sporting event. Please use your binoculars - and if upon closer examination your team turns out to be the Four Horsemen, give some thought to whether you still want them to win.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Welcome, and thanks for caring enough to donate your time and thoughts toward greater collective wisdom...
Terms of engagement:
* Please be civil.
* * * * Please do not post anonymously * * * (I'd remove this choice if I could, and I may remove your comment if you do) - instead, do this:
Click on the 'Name/URL' radiobutton, then enter your real name (if you're brave) or a pseudonym (if you're not). (You can leave the "URL" field blank.)
Or go ahead and click "Anonymous", but put your name in your comment.
* The Management reserves the right to delete comments (Moderation Certificate can be found here). You can always post it on a blog of your own.
If you run into technical difficulties, please a) accept my apologies, then b) email your comment to aherror2011 at gmail.com with "Comment for [name of this blog]" in the Subject line.
New policy re climate contrarianism comments as of 11/11/2009:
Comments questioning the climate science community's understanding of climate change (97% of active climatologists now believe that the earth is currently warming and that it's human-caused - link) will be deleted unless the commenter:
a) is local
b) uses his real name
c) provides link(s) to substantiate his claim(s)/inference(s)
d) is willing to collaborate on constructing an argument tree, to get us past the usual sterile point-counterpoint-countercounterpoint.
(For people who can't read the above, a summary:
1) Be civil;
2) Don't post w/o giving at least a pseudonym;
3) Don't espouse climate-denial crankery unless you're local and willing to stand behind it.)
Caveats:
1. Comments could be delayed: they are being moderated, and I'm sometimes away from the computer for a day or more.
2. : Perfectly legitimate comments are sometimes miscategorized (by the blogging platform) as spam, & not published. If this happens to yours, please notify me, else I might not notice for a day or two.