- Yourself. A weblog can be your commonplace book, where you store interesting links, quotations and ideas for later reference, and you don't necessarily put much energy into gluing disparate thoughts and URLs together with text. So it could just be a list of links with a few words describing each.
- Your far-flung friends and relatives, who'll be interested in what you're up to these days. They'll care about your insomnia and the loud neighbor next door.
- Your neighbors (loud or otherwise), who may be newcomers to the web and to weblogs. They'll care (a little) about what a weblog is, why to have one, who the Grand Olde Persons of blogging are. And if they're not reading other weblogs and you're writing for them then you can fill yours with interesting links that you found on other weblogs, and they won't complain that yours is yet another rehash of the Same Olde Stuff.
- Your mother. 'nuff said. Expect it to happen.
- People who share your subculture and opinions, with whom you can rant and ditto and feel united and powerful and in general rouse the rabble as Michael Moore did when he appeared at the Bowling for Columbine screening at the Nevada Theatre last fall (presumably not realizing that the oft-maligned (including by M.M.) Union's publisher was also present (and lashed out in response from a more powerful pulpit, which was followed by a decisive 20-vote margin on election day. (success has many fathers, but failure is an orphan...)). This strategy can backfire.
- People who don't share your subculture and opinions, which is where you & they get the most learning done. One of my favorite weblogs in this category has been Andrew Tobias's -- enough columns on finance to keep the wealthy visiting, enough on issues of social justice to keep them thinking. And a tone of respect throughout.
And all of this I guess brings up a question...who are you? I'm curious...for all I know you're nobody (note absence of web counter on page) but if not, feel free to drop me a one-line answer.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Welcome, and thanks for caring enough to donate your time and thoughts toward greater collective wisdom...
Terms of engagement:
* Please be civil.
* * * * Please do not post anonymously * * * (I'd remove this choice if I could, and I may remove your comment if you do) - instead, do this:
Click on the 'Name/URL' radiobutton, then enter your real name (if you're brave) or a pseudonym (if you're not). (You can leave the "URL" field blank.)
Or go ahead and click "Anonymous", but put your name in your comment.
* The Management reserves the right to delete comments (Moderation Certificate can be found here). You can always post it on a blog of your own.
If you run into technical difficulties, please a) accept my apologies, then b) email your comment to aherror2011 at gmail.com with "Comment for [name of this blog]" in the Subject line.
New policy re climate contrarianism comments as of 11/11/2009:
Comments questioning the climate science community's understanding of climate change (97% of active climatologists now believe that the earth is currently warming and that it's human-caused - link) will be deleted unless the commenter:
a) is local
b) uses his real name
c) provides link(s) to substantiate his claim(s)/inference(s)
d) is willing to collaborate on constructing an argument tree, to get us past the usual sterile point-counterpoint-countercounterpoint.
(For people who can't read the above, a summary:
1) Be civil;
2) Don't post w/o giving at least a pseudonym;
3) Don't espouse climate-denial crankery unless you're local and willing to stand behind it.)
Caveats:
1. Comments could be delayed: they are being moderated, and I'm sometimes away from the computer for a day or more.
2. : Perfectly legitimate comments are sometimes miscategorized (by the blogging platform) as spam, & not published. If this happens to yours, please notify me, else I might not notice for a day or two.