ncfocus

Ideas, issues and life in nevada county CA

Belaboring the obvious since 2003

about nevada county


Doc Searls
Dan Gillmor
Brad DeLong
Timothy Burke
Deborah Branscum
Talking Points Memo
Body and Soul
Metafilter

Places
stony run
field notes
pure land mountain

Local
Yubanet local news
GV neighbors
KNCO news
The Union
films

Occasional
Nevada City Free Press

Semi-local
Sac News & Review
Tom Nadeau
Sac Bee

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
it's a weblog
start your own, it's free

if using M$IE browser,
rightclick on link
-> OpenInNewWindow
is your friend.

privacy
ethics
belaboring

ncfocus2003@yahoo.com
(not checked daily)


Saturday, March 15, 2003
 

welcome to lovely scenic sodden nevada county

(oops, it got garbled when it Published. cleaned it up some, removed more over-the-top material, ie cheated and edited the post. not that you are likely to care.)

well I was going to just post this -

broken record

Too windy and too late to write much, so let me summarize--

Read Brad DeLong. Read Timothy Burke. Read DeLong. Read Burke. Read DeLong. Read Burke. Don't spend time here, read them.

And if you run across others of the same caliber, let me know.

but I can't now or you'll think I'm a whore. No slut though, no sirree, I only link to the top stuff. Mostly because as Brad points out it is so hard to find the the rest. (ed. note--not really, just hard to find the rest that hasn't already been blogrolled to death)

well while you're here, since you obviously didn't take my advice, a couple of questions for you and some links--

first the questions--

I'm up in smalltown/rural Nevada County CA where politics is a contact sport - and there was quite a battle last year for control of the Board of Supervisors, which the so-called conservatives won by 20 votes with the aid of $28k in mystery money (from 21st Century Insurance Group ? (la times, name and pw imahogg))

Fortunately we have the dedicated team at Yubanet for the county scoop online (The Union has had some good reporting on growth issues lately, but historically it has tended to be less informative), and KVMR news if you'd rather hear than read it, but it feels awfully lonely. Are there other communities going through these struggles and getting the word out with online news 'papers'? if so where are they? please email me if you know of any. Thanks...

2nd question - I keep vaguely remembering articles that I'd forgotten to save links to, and some of them are ones you'd need to search for by concept rather than by keyword (for ex. George Lakoff's metaphor of liberal vs conservative as family roles), so they stay lost for a long time or forever. Is there a metafilter-equivalent out there for the memory-impaired, where when we're being tormented by a lost link we can post a description of the page/article/post & get the URL from someone who knows?

links:
  • this might look new to you, it's old enough--remember Abigail's dream from 1995?
  • a couple of quotes on why intolerance of the fringe is bad for society-
    • From Tom G.'s comment on Shelley's post on Uncompromising Individualism -
      the 'cranks', the 'eccentrics', are the ones who make it possible for the wheel of the culture to turn: if everyone's sitting at the hub, no change is possible. Every society needs its questioners, its doubters, its devil's advocates, belonging by not belonging, supporting by not supporting...

    • From Brad Templeton's A Watched Populace Never Boils:
      The mainstream is often more comfortable with monitoring, just as it is more comfortable with censorship. What civil rights protect is not the majority, but the fringe. The fringe is often feared by the majority but it is the lifeblood of the society's future..."

  • Malcolm Gladwell, fount of much fascinating and retrospectively common sense, very much in the DeLongian-Burkeian vein. (I will confess to feeling a perverse pride in having helped him to write The New-Boy Network: What do job interviews really tell us?. or rather having helped Nalini Ambady (see section 2 of article) to do the research on snap judgments of teacher effectiveness that he cites. or rather having been one of the teaching fellows videotaped during the training program. And, according to student reviews, not in the correct tail of the distribution...)
  • the funny business.


hey, thanks for visiting.



Thursday, March 13, 2003
 

our animal friends

David now has a bear and a bobcat, and fewer chickens than before. Perished pet poultry plus peripatetic predators produces a pioneer perspective. As in a fervent desire to kill the buggers.

speaking of buggers, there was one hanging out in the kitchen doorway waiting for me when I got home tonight. It was a widder man, not a widder woman (smaller, no hourglass figure) - but a widder nonetheless. It makes you look at your clothes differently, & wish that see-through sleeves and legs were In, so you could determine who else was by visual rather than tactile means.

been working like a dog. would have something to say, maybe, but brain is dead, too tired, not enough sleep lately. recommendation - if you try Provigil, skip the caffeine that day, else you may be sorry late that night, and the next day.

Here. Go read Burke's crazy taxi piece -
What grips me is the sense that an extraordinary compound mistake is about to be made, the kind that shifts the forward motion of history onto a new track. It is like being a passenger in a car driven too quickly and erratically by someone who won’t listen to anyone else in the car. Even when you want to get to the same destination as the driver, you can’t help but feel that there’s a way to go there which doesn’t carry the same risk of flying through the guardrails and off a cliff.




Wednesday, March 12, 2003
 

small, tasteful rant on email abominations

actually it is not my rant, it is the work of a revered technology pundit -
Unless I have specifically asked for an attachment, don't send one... Why do I say this? ...They're unsafe. File attachments have become the preferred virus carrier for the jerks who like to pollute people's computers.
They're unnecessary, except in the rarest of cases. Plain text will almost always do everything you needed. Cut and paste the prose from the MS Word document into the body of the message...
Please don't send HTML e-mail. It doesn't use as much bandwidth as an attachment, but it uses much more than plain text. It's also unnecessary, and has the potential to be dangerous.

(note that this is merely a prophylactic rant - you, gentle reader, have sent me nothing whatsoever.)


Tuesday, March 11, 2003
 

idea for new weekend tourist attractant

Nevada City's always looking for an excuse to throw a party/parade, especially in wintertime when business is slow, so maybe we should put out a call for volunteers to star in our own unstirring rendition of Frozen Dead Guy Days?

(found via Dave Barry's weblog)


 

Motto of the Month

David Weinberger's weblog, aka Joho the Blog, is

Duct Tape and Plastic Sheeting for the Soul





 

Conservative psychology and politics II

Another possible reason for why conservative politics are dirtier (see previous post) - maybe the average conservative is more reasonable than the average liberal...
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable man persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
- George Bernard Shaw

...which would leave a power vacuum in conservative politics, which would be filled by individuals with more personal motivations. In fact I have data supporting this hypothesis (i.e. I read it on metafilter and didn't write it myself) --
...One thing I like about being more liberal is that liberals I have been involved with tend to take personal action on behalf of their beliefs; they get involved...The conservatives I know (I have many friends who...oh, never mind) are perfectly happy to let other people take those actions for them; their activism is in agreement.



 

another reason to keep your website up to date

Someone might visit your website in order to get an email address.

Someone might read on said website that email to said address would go to a person who was an acquaintance.

Someone might send email to said acquaintance at said address, and when a reply was not immediately forthcoming, send another with a subject line like "Excuse me, are you sentient?"

It would be unfortunate if the recipient of the two emails turned out to be someone else entirely.

note: this post could also be entitled "another reason to look before you leap"


Monday, March 10, 2003
 

Conservative psychology and politics

It seems a lot of people lately have been noticing a pattern of fundamental differences between liberal and conservative politics--that the conservative faction is far more often the one that, for example, cheats on polls and refuses interviews and debates, argues using fists, jams the Democratic "get out the vote" calls, harasses the opposition by eviscerating cats and hammering nails into tires, has hypocritical pundits, etc. Yet as individuals, certainly the conservatives I know are just as ethical as the liberals, so how does this imbalance emerge?

A few of us were talking about it in the bar Friday night while ingesting the usual epiphanogenic (merlot) and it came to us, it doesn't stem from ideology it stems from psychology, and ratchets, and discrimination or lack thereof. Conservatives seem to have, or need, certainty, absolutes--they're not the ones driving around town sporting the "I could be wrong" bumperstickers, they tend to expound rather than query. This is correlated with a tendency to see things in black and white--either you're with us or you're against us, either you're good or you're evil--there's no desire to see or weigh shades of gray. (For ex. I've been told by a (conservative) coworker that I have no business expressing the belief that driving an SUV is more harmful to the environment, because I also harm the environment by driving, period--in other words only those who are 100% pure should make judgements, everyone else shouldn't). Given that politics by its nature does not reward candid behavior, a certain amount of deception is inevitable, which leads black-and-whiters to say "all politicians are sleazy" and newspaper editorials to say "both sides are equally to blame". And if you can't/won't make distinctions, you won't be turned off by additional sleazy behavior on your side, so there's no force acting to restrain the flowering of sleaze in your faction.

I do not know how we could go about improving this situation--perhaps more merlot next week will reveal the solution...

(disclaimer: this is obviously a generalization, will not apply in all instances. "pattern" and "generalization" seem to be synonymous...)





Lasik Surgeon