Stale blog offering Perspective on ideas, issues and life from Nevada County, California - belaboring the obvious since 2003
Friday, November 04, 2011
"Report an Error" for Nevada County media?
2 comments:
Welcome, and thanks for caring enough to donate your time and thoughts toward greater collective wisdom...
Terms of engagement:
* Please be civil.
* * * * Please do not post anonymously * * * (I'd remove this choice if I could, and I may remove your comment if you do) - instead, do this:
Click on the 'Name/URL' radiobutton, then enter your real name (if you're brave) or a pseudonym (if you're not). (You can leave the "URL" field blank.)
Or go ahead and click "Anonymous", but put your name in your comment.
* The Management reserves the right to delete comments (Moderation Certificate can be found here). You can always post it on a blog of your own.
If you run into technical difficulties, please a) accept my apologies, then b) email your comment to aherror2011 at gmail.com with "Comment for [name of this blog]" in the Subject line.
New policy re climate contrarianism comments as of 11/11/2009:
Comments questioning the climate science community's understanding of climate change (97% of active climatologists now believe that the earth is currently warming and that it's human-caused - link) will be deleted unless the commenter:
a) is local
b) uses his real name
c) provides link(s) to substantiate his claim(s)/inference(s)
d) is willing to collaborate on constructing an argument tree, to get us past the usual sterile point-counterpoint-countercounterpoint.
(For people who can't read the above, a summary:
1) Be civil;
2) Don't post w/o giving at least a pseudonym;
3) Don't espouse climate-denial crankery unless you're local and willing to stand behind it.)
Caveats:
1. Comments could be delayed: they are being moderated, and I'm sometimes away from the computer for a day or more.
2. : Perfectly legitimate comments are sometimes miscategorized (by the blogging platform) as spam, & not published. If this happens to yours, please notify me, else I might not notice for a day or two.
Anna:
ReplyDeleteThanks for the entry about media updating errors... Mainstream print media has a legacy of "errors and corrections" as I'm sure you know. New digital media I don't think has the same legacy or convictions.
"Report an Error Alliance" (which I did not look at) sounds great. But, please consider another layer, another faction, another SOURCE, that an already time impinged service might need to embrace...
Oh yes, you are right: I am arguing for and against the same issue.
But ultimately, I'm asking, "with the 'democratization of information' how is information vetted?".
It's not...
Buyer beware...
- there are exceptions. But isn't it as difficult as always knowing which large corporate organizations to trust, as well as which small operations to trust?
Yes, it does require that the blog host have a sense of what is & what isn't a reliable source, & of how far this reliability is likely to extend.
ReplyDeleteAnd it could possibly be gamed, under certain conditions & "knowledge states" of the host and the bug-reporter.
But I think it's worth trying.
(after all, there is a reality, science is not a liberal conspiracy, etc)