This NYTimes article on a Georgia company's new way of turning wood chips into biofuel is encouraging - if it works out, it'd be great news for meeting Nevada County's energy needs and clearing our underbrush.
(and no, I have not tried to work out the math here.)
Stale blog offering Perspective on ideas, issues and life from Nevada County, California - belaboring the obvious since 2003
Wednesday, September 28, 2011
4 comments:
Welcome, and thanks for caring enough to donate your time and thoughts toward greater collective wisdom...
Terms of engagement:
* Please be civil.
* * * * Please do not post anonymously * * * (I'd remove this choice if I could, and I may remove your comment if you do) - instead, do this:
Click on the 'Name/URL' radiobutton, then enter your real name (if you're brave) or a pseudonym (if you're not). (You can leave the "URL" field blank.)
Or go ahead and click "Anonymous", but put your name in your comment.
* The Management reserves the right to delete comments (Moderation Certificate can be found here). You can always post it on a blog of your own.
If you run into technical difficulties, please a) accept my apologies, then b) email your comment to aherror2011 at gmail.com with "Comment for [name of this blog]" in the Subject line.
New policy re climate contrarianism comments as of 11/11/2009:
Comments questioning the climate science community's understanding of climate change (97% of active climatologists now believe that the earth is currently warming and that it's human-caused - link) will be deleted unless the commenter:
a) is local
b) uses his real name
c) provides link(s) to substantiate his claim(s)/inference(s)
d) is willing to collaborate on constructing an argument tree, to get us past the usual sterile point-counterpoint-countercounterpoint.
(For people who can't read the above, a summary:
1) Be civil;
2) Don't post w/o giving at least a pseudonym;
3) Don't espouse climate-denial crankery unless you're local and willing to stand behind it.)
Caveats:
1. Comments could be delayed: they are being moderated, and I'm sometimes away from the computer for a day or more.
2. : Perfectly legitimate comments are sometimes miscategorized (by the blogging platform) as spam, & not published. If this happens to yours, please notify me, else I might not notice for a day or two.
The reporting on efforts like this gives a false hope that technology will allow us to have our cake and eat it too. I suspect the only possible practical use for cellulose is to combust it to make electricity. Otherwise forget it.
ReplyDeleteIt is likely that the fuel industry is sitting on patents that would dramatically conserve fossil fuels and the economics of exploitation keep them hidden.
The most practical way to save fuel is still to not use it.
> "a false hope that technology [will let us continue]"..."only possible practical use for cellulose is to combust it"...
ReplyDeleteGreg, is there evidence to support your opinions, or are they just opinions?
> The most practical way to save fuel is still to not use it.
True, efficiency is the low-hanging fruit; but as a sole solution it won't fly, politically or practically. We need to move forward with new energy solutions; as we have in the past.
I agree with you Anna that we should be able to support our points at least to some reasonable extent. I understand your point that this is a lot of work and probably not worth the effort in many ways.
ReplyDeleteI truly believe, though, it is important for everyone or at least a decided voting majority to have a realistic understanding of energy realities.
From what I can find out, there is still a debate about the ultimate efficiency of ethanol production from corn. Estimates range from negative to 25% efficiency. I did not find disagreement about that it is not cost effective and that it must be subsidized for it to be feasible.
Even though the potential efficiency of the process described for cellulose in this blog was not given I assume it is no better than ethanol production from corn.
Cellulose waste can be burned at an efficiency of 80%. It is used cost effectively today for heat and electricity generation.
Update.
ReplyDelete