Thursday, March 10, 2011

Journalism manuals

There's probably a better compilation out there, but recently I've run across these -

Of the 3, the last seemed most worthwhile; but all are helpful.

7 comments:

  1. Then there's FAIR (Fairness And Accuracy in Reporting ... http://www.fair.org/index.php), just to keep things confusing.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The FAIR manual looks like it might be really useful. I think I should study it more closely, and see if I can get any ideas for further investigating SwiftHack.

    The KPOV handbook focuses too much on format, methinks.

    -- frank

    ReplyDelete
  3. Don, I had a feeling a FAIR was missing; thanks.

    And yes frank, I was impressed with the IJ manual ( tinyurl.com/ijafrica )

    As for the other one, hey, if it's got stuff I don't know but need to, that's enough...
    (since I'd like to get back into the radio station, after wrapping up a few more online things)
    Haven't read it yet though.

    ReplyDelete
  4. > "...since I'd like to get back into the radio station..."

    Or not; I kind of got brushed off, when I inquired again.
    (& considering the quality of my gift of gab, this may not be entirely a bad thing)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Another good radio interview resource: Interview & Live Broadcast Tips

    ...and, for the record: I'd made the previous comment ("...gift of gab...") before discovering the magic of audio editing.
    :-)

    ReplyDelete
  6. While I see there's a cit-j handbook - (*book*, "on behalf of the Colorado-based National Association of Citizen Journalists (NACJ.us)"), I didn't see a sample chapter and didn't find the site's tone promising.
    (... why a *book*? if the info is good, a foundation should pay to make it available online.)

    CitJ instructions&pointers are provided in video format at YouTube's Reporters Center; it's supremely frustrating though, since video's so inefficient, plus some %^&* videos bait&switch; I want to be able to skim the info, yet YouTube's not set up to allow people to effectively contribute notes&transcripts for others to easily find&read. Grrr. Did we really invent the web in order to go back to watching television?
    #venting

    ReplyDelete
  7. p.s. to previous comment, links to an early excerpt of the handbook, and to its TOC.

    ReplyDelete

Welcome, and thanks for caring enough to donate your time and thoughts toward greater collective wisdom...

Terms of engagement:
* Please be civil.
* * * * Please do not post anonymously * * * (I'd remove this choice if I could, and I may remove your comment if you do) - instead, do this:
Click on the 'Name/URL' radiobutton, then enter your real name (if you're brave) or a pseudonym (if you're not). (You can leave the "URL" field blank.)
Or go ahead and click "Anonymous", but put your name in your comment.

* The Management reserves the right to delete comments (Moderation Certificate can be found here). You can always post it on a blog of your own.

If you run into technical difficulties, please a) accept my apologies, then b) email your comment to aherror2011 at gmail.com with "Comment for [name of this blog]" in the Subject line.

New policy re climate contrarianism comments as of 11/11/2009:
Comments questioning the climate science community's understanding of climate change (97% of active climatologists now believe that the earth is currently warming and that it's human-caused - link) will be deleted unless the commenter:
a) is local
b) uses his real name
c) provides link(s) to substantiate his claim(s)/inference(s)
d) is willing to collaborate on constructing an argument tree, to get us past the usual sterile point-counterpoint-countercounterpoint.
(For people who can't read the above, a summary:
1) Be civil;
2) Don't post w/o giving at least a pseudonym;
3) Don't espouse climate-denial crankery unless you're local and willing to stand behind it.)

Caveats:
1. Comments could be delayed: they are being moderated, and I'm sometimes away from the computer for a day or more.
2. : Perfectly legitimate comments are sometimes miscategorized (by the blogging platform) as spam, & not published. If this happens to yours, please notify me, else I might not notice for a day or two.