Friday, September 24, 2010

Feedback for Poynter's online training site NewsU

Dear NewsU folks:

Please, when you survey people who've taken a NewsU course, don't just ask them to tell you how valuable the course was, also ask them for suggestions on how it - and the NewsU experience as a whole - could be improved. Otherwise it's frustrating, to someone who *wants* NewsU to be a really valuable resource, to get the feeling that you might not want to hear suggestions.
(so then we go and vent on our blogs...)

My suggestions:
1) make it possible to search for free courses;
2) show course cost more prominently, so we don't have to click through to find out;
3) offer "scholarships" for the impecunious - or some other way to let them "sing for their [educational] supper"
4) for courses in areas subject to disinformation pressure, e.g. Covering Climate Change, make sure you offer the tools the journalist most needs, to equip them to protect their work from being warped by this pressure.

Thank you.

3 comments:

  1. Dear NC Focus folks,

    Thanks for the great suggestions.
    We always want to hear how to improve our training experience.

    We really like to hear your suggestions. Sometimes venting is OK, too.

    1. We do have a search button that covers "Free to $25."
    It is on the www.newsu.org/courses page. We look at having a button that is just "Free."
    2. You have pointed out a bug that needs to be fixed. We agree.
    3. We have scholarships for almost everything that has a fee. No singing needed.
    We wish we had more funds available. We are working hard on that.
    4. We are working on two modules about information pressure.
    First, a course on propaganda. Later, we'll have something on sourcing and verification.
    And we're always looking to add more to our Climate Change module.

    Thanks, really, for the comments.

    The Poynter's NewsU Crew

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you Mr. Finberg, for your fine comment and for the NewsU Feedback page.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Alas, I dropped by the site again just now, to see what's there of interest, and it's still an overly-paginated PITA to find course info on; so I submitted more feedback -

    "Courses data - could you make it possible for a visitor to get it in .csv format please? (presumably you have this info as a database online; providing it in .csv format would serve those visitors who don't find the current front end to be user-triendly)"

    One of the things I do love about the present, compared to the past, is that websites have evolved, & are generally much less frustrating to navigate now. Thank you Jakob Nielsen...

    ReplyDelete

Welcome, and thanks for caring enough to donate your time and thoughts toward greater collective wisdom...

Terms of engagement:
* Please be civil.
* * * * Please do not post anonymously * * * (I'd remove this choice if I could, and I may remove your comment if you do) - instead, do this:
Click on the 'Name/URL' radiobutton, then enter your real name (if you're brave) or a pseudonym (if you're not). (You can leave the "URL" field blank.)
Or go ahead and click "Anonymous", but put your name in your comment.

* The Management reserves the right to delete comments (Moderation Certificate can be found here). You can always post it on a blog of your own.

If you run into technical difficulties, please a) accept my apologies, then b) email your comment to aherror2011 at gmail.com with "Comment for [name of this blog]" in the Subject line.

New policy re climate contrarianism comments as of 11/11/2009:
Comments questioning the climate science community's understanding of climate change (97% of active climatologists now believe that the earth is currently warming and that it's human-caused - link) will be deleted unless the commenter:
a) is local
b) uses his real name
c) provides link(s) to substantiate his claim(s)/inference(s)
d) is willing to collaborate on constructing an argument tree, to get us past the usual sterile point-counterpoint-countercounterpoint.
(For people who can't read the above, a summary:
1) Be civil;
2) Don't post w/o giving at least a pseudonym;
3) Don't espouse climate-denial crankery unless you're local and willing to stand behind it.)

Caveats:
1. Comments could be delayed: they are being moderated, and I'm sometimes away from the computer for a day or more.
2. : Perfectly legitimate comments are sometimes miscategorized (by the blogging platform) as spam, & not published. If this happens to yours, please notify me, else I might not notice for a day or two.