The ones who walk away from Omelas (pdf)
Would you choose to leave, or stay?
What do you think your fellow community members would do?
...
Stale blog offering Perspective on ideas, issues and life from Nevada County, California - belaboring the obvious since 2003
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
2 comments:
Welcome, and thanks for caring enough to donate your time and thoughts toward greater collective wisdom...
Terms of engagement:
* Please be civil.
* * * * Please do not post anonymously * * * (I'd remove this choice if I could, and I may remove your comment if you do) - instead, do this:
Click on the 'Name/URL' radiobutton, then enter your real name (if you're brave) or a pseudonym (if you're not). (You can leave the "URL" field blank.)
Or go ahead and click "Anonymous", but put your name in your comment.
* The Management reserves the right to delete comments (Moderation Certificate can be found here). You can always post it on a blog of your own.
If you run into technical difficulties, please a) accept my apologies, then b) email your comment to aherror2011 at gmail.com with "Comment for [name of this blog]" in the Subject line.
New policy re climate contrarianism comments as of 11/11/2009:
Comments questioning the climate science community's understanding of climate change (97% of active climatologists now believe that the earth is currently warming and that it's human-caused - link) will be deleted unless the commenter:
a) is local
b) uses his real name
c) provides link(s) to substantiate his claim(s)/inference(s)
d) is willing to collaborate on constructing an argument tree, to get us past the usual sterile point-counterpoint-countercounterpoint.
(For people who can't read the above, a summary:
1) Be civil;
2) Don't post w/o giving at least a pseudonym;
3) Don't espouse climate-denial crankery unless you're local and willing to stand behind it.)
Caveats:
1. Comments could be delayed: they are being moderated, and I'm sometimes away from the computer for a day or more.
2. : Perfectly legitimate comments are sometimes miscategorized (by the blogging platform) as spam, & not published. If this happens to yours, please notify me, else I might not notice for a day or two.
I loved Le Guin's Earthsea Trilogy when I was a young man, and appreciated them even more after I spent some years delving into Jungian psychology. Le Guin knew Jung, and much of her writing draws on his insights.
ReplyDeleteShe had a wonderful essay called something like "Why Are Americans Afraid of Dragons?"(in a book called "Language of the Night: Essays on Fantasy and Science Fiction").
She wrote the best single line ever written about growing up, and it was in the context of the appreciation of fantasy. The line was something like, "An adult is a child who survived."
I understood her sentence to mean that -- contrary to the Biblical notion that an adult "puts away childish things" -- a fully realized adult is one who carries the best of childish impulses (including an ability to fantasize) into adulthood.
So, would I leave Omelas or not?
Yes, I would!
Or, I'd stay and free the child from the cellar ... which is the same thing in psychological terms.
The town itself is like a dysfunctional psyche, with some parts living joyously in light and other parts locked away in darkness and pain.
In the tale, those who leave do so only after this encounter with their "dark side."
The task before them now is to integrate all those disparate parts into a whole. They begin their quest to do that by leaving (or staying and freeing the child).
The town is at once a metaphor for the individual dysfunctional psyche, and also a metaphor for a society built on dysfunctional psyches.
IMHO ...
By the way, when I said "LeGuin knew Jung" I only meant that she knew his work.
ReplyDelete