Tuesday, August 07, 2007

A failure to communicate: Scientists, journalists, reality

A very nice explanation of why journalists - and scientists - have failed for so long to inform the public about global warming*, in Pants On Fire, part 1 over at Little Blog in the Big Woods - it's the very forseeable, and very unfortunate, outcome of their different cultural strictures and conventions, regarding communicating about reality:
...we [in our society] rely on scientific opinion, as reported; by reporters.
...
...[It is remarkably common] for humans to speak to each other, hold what passes for a conversation, and leave the conversation reasonably satisfied; but with no information having changed hands.
Scientists, journalists, "policy makers", and the general public, are doing this now, big time...[They] do not, in fact, speak the same languages; and they do not know it. We need interpreters, and have none...
[Consequence, re global warming:]
...The real equation, in 1988, was that 85% of the scientists who studied the problem were 85% sure we were heading for horrifyingly serious problems, and the majority of their opposition were known fools.
...[But] what [journalists] reported was: no one is sure, and Dr. Billy, a colorful contrarian, says "BULL!".



Not unrelated: xarker on Science and Media, and their practioners' respective failures to communicate and to adapt.
...a New Yorker cartoon of two aging scientists in a quiet, darkened lab office. One says to the other, "Well, at least we never stooped to popularizing science." There's a lot of dark humor implied in that subject, and it's not related solely to scientists.


And (Wed update) The Truth About Denial - Newsweek on the deniers' funding machine

5 comments:

  1. Amazing but true. Even if the cliff is clearly visible, it seems the bulk of humanity only becomes aware about half way down to the ocean....

    In 1952 or so an engineer proposed 1 way toll collecting on the bay bridges in the SF Bay Area. He was rediculed until about 20 years later when they decided to "give it a try" because things had gotten so bad. Now we're trying to get everybody on FastTrak, same problem of human inertia.....

    ReplyDelete
  2. As an activist with a small a, I am amazed by how many people contact me to make a fuss over something. They themselves would NEVER do it but me, well...and therein lies the problem. It's your problem! It's not someone else's problem--it's YOURS. No one is going to fix climate change FOR YOU. Everyone, including scientists, want to sit on their butts andlet someone else fix it all. Scientists somehow have decided it's ok to publish papers that the planet is dying and go home and forget about it. I blame scientists for part of our mess because these are the people who BELONG in politics. These are the people who NEED to be making the decisions for the public and how skewed that they people with the most information have created their own taboo against getting involved politically. So it goes to people like George Bush...I blame scientists for our crisis and their utter lack of courage.
    We are going die because everyone was to busy watching their own butt while waiting for that proverbial someone else to come along and fix it all.

    ReplyDelete
  3. > "It's not someone else's problem--it's YOURS. No one is going to fix climate change FOR YOU."

    amen.
    Someone told me recently that I might as well sit back now, I'd made my fuss over An Inconvenient Truth, and now everyone was much more aware.

    Said person has, to my knowledge, made no lifestyle changes since seeing the movie; and to my knowledge neither have others in this person's social circle; and to my knowledge this person would never mention the moral imperative to make such lifestyle changes with their social circle.

    Yo, this is reality speaking here - that film wasn't fiction.

    ReplyDelete
  4. anna, how can i reach you by email re dot earth posts and polar cities?

    danny b

    ReplyDelete
  5. Just for the record (and to backtrack on my comment above), my views on "the moral imperative to make such lifestyle changes" have changed - as Bill Rees (via Alex Steffen) says, "We're all on the same ship and what we do in our individual cabins is of almost no consequence in terms of the direction the ship is going."

    Exhorting people to take voluntary action is, at this point, misguided.
    (as it was when I made the above comment...)

    ReplyDelete

Welcome, and thanks for caring enough to donate your time and thoughts toward greater collective wisdom...

Terms of engagement:
* Please be civil.
* * * * Please do not post anonymously * * * (I'd remove this choice if I could, and I may remove your comment if you do) - instead, do this:
Click on the 'Name/URL' radiobutton, then enter your real name (if you're brave) or a pseudonym (if you're not). (You can leave the "URL" field blank.)
Or go ahead and click "Anonymous", but put your name in your comment.

* The Management reserves the right to delete comments (Moderation Certificate can be found here). You can always post it on a blog of your own.

If you run into technical difficulties, please a) accept my apologies, then b) email your comment to aherror2011 at gmail.com with "Comment for [name of this blog]" in the Subject line.

New policy re climate contrarianism comments as of 11/11/2009:
Comments questioning the climate science community's understanding of climate change (97% of active climatologists now believe that the earth is currently warming and that it's human-caused - link) will be deleted unless the commenter:
a) is local
b) uses his real name
c) provides link(s) to substantiate his claim(s)/inference(s)
d) is willing to collaborate on constructing an argument tree, to get us past the usual sterile point-counterpoint-countercounterpoint.
(For people who can't read the above, a summary:
1) Be civil;
2) Don't post w/o giving at least a pseudonym;
3) Don't espouse climate-denial crankery unless you're local and willing to stand behind it.)

Caveats:
1. Comments could be delayed: they are being moderated, and I'm sometimes away from the computer for a day or more.
2. : Perfectly legitimate comments are sometimes miscategorized (by the blogging platform) as spam, & not published. If this happens to yours, please notify me, else I might not notice for a day or two.