Dec. 23 update:
Finally put up the interview with Chris over at NCDocuments, apologies for the delay. And you might want to put the eye back in for now, since the below-mentioned bit of interest doesn't seem to have morphed into anything substantive.
But the story's not over yet.
------------------------
Just to let you know, there's been a bit of interest in the story so keep an eye out...
Big thanks to Chris for long phone interview this morning (and for recent water quality, which has been great, at my place at least) and to Mark for the "high priority" designation that made Chris's time available.
No bombshells; still digesting the Q&A, and need to do some research, and hear back from Mark on some quick questions; don't expect a post on it until Friday at the very earliest.
According to Chris, the smell is from Volvox and Chlamydomonas algae.
Stale blog offering Perspective on ideas, issues and life from Nevada County, California - belaboring the obvious since 2003
Tuesday, December 13, 2005
3 comments:
Welcome, and thanks for caring enough to donate your time and thoughts toward greater collective wisdom...
Terms of engagement:
* Please be civil.
* * * * Please do not post anonymously * * * (I'd remove this choice if I could, and I may remove your comment if you do) - instead, do this:
Click on the 'Name/URL' radiobutton, then enter your real name (if you're brave) or a pseudonym (if you're not). (You can leave the "URL" field blank.)
Or go ahead and click "Anonymous", but put your name in your comment.
* The Management reserves the right to delete comments (Moderation Certificate can be found here). You can always post it on a blog of your own.
If you run into technical difficulties, please a) accept my apologies, then b) email your comment to aherror2011 at gmail.com with "Comment for [name of this blog]" in the Subject line.
New policy re climate contrarianism comments as of 11/11/2009:
Comments questioning the climate science community's understanding of climate change (97% of active climatologists now believe that the earth is currently warming and that it's human-caused - link) will be deleted unless the commenter:
a) is local
b) uses his real name
c) provides link(s) to substantiate his claim(s)/inference(s)
d) is willing to collaborate on constructing an argument tree, to get us past the usual sterile point-counterpoint-countercounterpoint.
(For people who can't read the above, a summary:
1) Be civil;
2) Don't post w/o giving at least a pseudonym;
3) Don't espouse climate-denial crankery unless you're local and willing to stand behind it.)
Caveats:
1. Comments could be delayed: they are being moderated, and I'm sometimes away from the computer for a day or more.
2. : Perfectly legitimate comments are sometimes miscategorized (by the blogging platform) as spam, & not published. If this happens to yours, please notify me, else I might not notice for a day or two.
Stick with the story -- if you can solve this problem with cooperation even though you've got zero institutional clout, you'll have really accomplished something.
ReplyDeleteIf you've not tapped in to your local academic resources yet, consider making some calls. The problem is that academic knowledge can be so specialized that a "local" expert may be no expert at all. So if you've never heard of Profnet, give it a try here. It doesn't always return usable hits, but every now and then you find that there's someone at some random university who has been studying your exact subject for the past 20 years. Anyway, if Profnet won't take your query because you're not "professional" enough, send it to me and I'll submit it for you.
By the way, based on what I've read here I'd really be looking into the possibility that you've got localized biofilms colonizing your pipe interiors. If that were the case, then you'd be trying to figure out what causes those biofilms to expand and contract.
Thanks Daniel.
ReplyDeleteAs for ProfNet - argh:
"To ensure our members that they are working with bona fide journalists, we must now require registration. If you are already registered, please log in at left."
So, looks like there are 2 problems with citizen journalism (other than competence/training) -
1. no backing (with the exception of individual helpful journalists)
and
2. no form of accreditation - ProfNet has no way to know that I'm not the third-grader down the street (or the ranting nut in the street.)
And IRE doesn't have a cit-j membership category either.
And nor does Nevada City's manager - when I asked him if Alan Stahler (local science print and radio journalist) and I could see the reservoir, he told me:
> "The wastewater and water plants are restricted access facilities and not publically accessible"
I've emailed him (twice) asking "Would they be accessible to a reporter?", and while I haven't been able to get an answer, I suspect it would be 'yes'.
And as for what you've read here - "if your mother says she loves you, check it out" - the current unwillingness of city and plant manager to let us see the reservoir makes me reluctant to report that it is 'clean'. Trust, but verify...
I wonder if they'd let a hydrologist in.
> "while I haven't been able to get an answer, I suspect it would be 'yes'."
ReplyDeleteI suspected wrong; ran into Mark today and asked for clarification, he said "no public access" means "no access to reporters either".