Saturday, May 03, 2003

What sitcom is this anyway?

[post removed until such day as there is actual evidence ]

1 comment:

  1. I should explain about what happened here, although my understanding is still incomplete.

    As a new and all too wet-behind-the-ears blogger, I was contacted by an excited and motivated 3rd party who told me a story that, if untrue, was libelous in the extreme. I posted a sanitized tease here, ala Herb Caen, not giving names or other identifying info.
    This person urged me to be more specific, and swore that the story was true and would be coming out in the next few weeks; and also shared & urged me to print a second scurrilous story.

    Now I may not be the sharpest knife in the drawer, but I did have enough sense - and consideration for the privacy of the individuals mentioned - not to print more.

    As time has passed and I've grown a little less naive, I've wondered about these incidents, and have tried, multiple times, to contact the person to ask just what had been going on & why the pressure on *me* to print them - but without success.

    Needless to say, if something like this were to happen today, I'd have *no* interest.

    ReplyDelete

Welcome, and thanks for caring enough to donate your time and thoughts toward greater collective wisdom...

Terms of engagement:
* Please be civil.
* * * * Please do not post anonymously * * * (I'd remove this choice if I could, and I may remove your comment if you do) - instead, do this:
Click on the 'Name/URL' radiobutton, then enter your real name (if you're brave) or a pseudonym (if you're not). (You can leave the "URL" field blank.)
Or go ahead and click "Anonymous", but put your name in your comment.

* The Management reserves the right to delete comments (Moderation Certificate can be found here). You can always post it on a blog of your own.

If you run into technical difficulties, please a) accept my apologies, then b) email your comment to aherror2011 at gmail.com with "Comment for [name of this blog]" in the Subject line.

New policy re climate contrarianism comments as of 11/11/2009:
Comments questioning the climate science community's understanding of climate change (97% of active climatologists now believe that the earth is currently warming and that it's human-caused - link) will be deleted unless the commenter:
a) is local
b) uses his real name
c) provides link(s) to substantiate his claim(s)/inference(s)
d) is willing to collaborate on constructing an argument tree, to get us past the usual sterile point-counterpoint-countercounterpoint.
(For people who can't read the above, a summary:
1) Be civil;
2) Don't post w/o giving at least a pseudonym;
3) Don't espouse climate-denial crankery unless you're local and willing to stand behind it.)

Caveats:
1. Comments could be delayed: they are being moderated, and I'm sometimes away from the computer for a day or more.
2. : Perfectly legitimate comments are sometimes miscategorized (by the blogging platform) as spam, & not published. If this happens to yours, please notify me, else I might not notice for a day or two.